Is Free Trade or Protectionism Biblical?

Share Two Edges of the Sword Post:

It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, But the glory of kings is to search out a matter” ( Proverbs 25:2).

A few days ago I sent out an excellent article on free trade. This one today is the rebuttal, also excellent. What is the biblical answer?

On many such controversial questions about biblical truth that I have had during my life I have come to see that I was just flat wrong on my views and have changed 180 degrees. On others, I have wrestled for several years trying to come to understand what the Bible teaches on the matter before finally seeing, at least from my perspective, the answer. God alone gives light to see His truth – to whom, when, and about what He alone chooses. The verse above says it is His glory to  do so. It is my glory to continue to pursue his truth until I go to be with Him. Then I will know.

Free trade a la traditional conservative thought, vs. protectionism via tariffs a la Trump, is one of the current issues I am “searching out.” What is the biblical position? Here is what I am currently thinking.

Based on God’s model in the Bible for civil government- the Hebrew Republic in the Bible – is open borders, free trade, open everything! Government has nothing to say about trade. Everyone in the world is free to come and enjoy the blessings of God poured out on America – with this minor caveat: Everyone must be a practicing, Bible believing Christian to be a citizen. This means true diversity in every external characteristic but complete unity of faith.

However, no matter one’s faith, he can live here as a “sojourner” or “stranger,” accepted and honored, but no voting. Also, as with citizens, no welfare, there is no government assistance of any kind. This is beyond the scope of government, which is only to punish law breakers and protect law keepers. The sojourner has only the freedom to do as he pleases within the laws of the country, even not be a Christian if he so desires – just no voting. Picture that! I have written a short book proposing that for America, what changes that would necessitate, what the nation would look like, and how it could happen, based the biblical model – Let Earth Receive Her King.

As I show in the book, I believe that this is “the law of God” – God’s revealed will for civil government. This is true, biblical “globalism,” or “one-world government” with Jesus as “King over all  nations.”

However, we are far from His revealed will today. One of the two legitimate, biblical uses of God’s law is as a mirror to show us how we are failing to keep it and to bring us to repentance. “Oh Lord, I repent for not being involved in our civil government, one of Your three ordained institutions. I have not been interested in Your kingdm coming there. Forgive me.”

This is living “by faith,” but until we arrive at faith, the law’s second legitimate use is as a fence to hold us in place “before faith comes” (Galatians 3:23). This is where we are as a nation today: “Before faith comes,” and the Lord answers the prayer He called us to pray that His kingdom come His will be done on the earth. Until that day when our country follows the biblical pattern we will need fences – tariffs, protectionism, etc. 

The following is an excellent article by Pay Buchanan defending protectionism.

By Pat Buchanan:
Robert Bartley, the late editorial page editor of The Wall Street Journal, was a free trade zealot who for decades championed a five-word amendment to the Constitution: “There shall be open borders.”

Bartley accepted what the erasure of America’s borders and an endless influx or foreign peoples and goods would mean for his country.

Said Bartley, “I think the nation-state is finished.”

His vision and ideology had a long pedigree.

This free trade, open borders cult first flowered in 18th-century Britain. The St. Paul of this post-Christian faith was Richard Cobden, who mesmerized elites with the grandeur of his vision and the power of his rhetoric.

In Free Trade Hall in Manchester, Jan. 15, 1846, the crowd was so immense the seats had to be removed. There, Cobden thundered:

“I look farther; I see in the Free Trade principle that which shall act on the moral world as the principle of gravitation in the universe — drawing men together, thrusting aside the antagonisms of race, and creed, and language, and uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace.”

Britain converted to this utopian faith and threw open her markets to the world. Across the Atlantic, however, another system, that would be known as the “American System,” had been embraced.

The second bill signed by President Washington was the Tariff Act of 1789. Said the Founding Father of his country in his first address to Congress: “A free people … should promote such manufactures as tend to make them independent on others for essential, particularly military supplies.”

In his 1791 “Report on Manufactures,” Alexander Hamilton wrote, “Every nation ought to endeavor to possess within itself all the essentials of national supply. These comprise the means of subsistence, habitat, clothing and defence.”

This was wisdom born of experience.

At Yorktown, Americans had to rely on French muskets and ships to win their independence. They were determined to erect a system that would end our reliance on Europe for the necessities of our national life, and establish new bonds of mutual dependency — among Americans.

Britain’s folly became manifest in World War I, as a self-reliant America stayed out, while selling to an import-dependent England the food, supplies and arms she needed to survive but could not produce.

America’s own first major steps toward free trade, open borders and globalism came with JFK’s Trade Expansion Act and LBJ’s Immigration Act of 1965.

By the end of the Cold War, however, a reaction had set in, and a great awakening begun. U.S. trade deficits in goods were surging into the hundreds of billions, and more than a million legal and illegal immigrants were flooding in yearly, visibly altering the character of the country.

Americans were coming to realize that free trade was gutting the nation’s manufacturing base and open borders meant losing the country in which they grew up. And on this earth there is no greater loss.

The new resistance of Western man to the globalist agenda is now everywhere manifest.

We see it in Trump’s hostility to NAFTA, his tariffs, his border wall.

We see it in England’s declaration of independence from the EU in Brexit. We see it in the political triumphs of Polish, Hungarian and Czech nationalists, in anti-EU parties rising across Europe, in the secessionist movements in Scotland and Catalonia and Ukraine, and in the admiration for Russian nationalist Vladimir Putin.

Europeans have begun to see themselves as indigenous peoples whose Old Continent is mortally imperiled by the hundreds of millions of invaders wading across the Med and desperate come and occupy their homelands.

Who owns the future? Who will decide the fate of the West?

The problem of the internationalists is that the vision they have on offer — a world of free trade, open borders and global government — are constructs of the mind that do not engage the heart.

Men will fight for family, faith and country. But how many will lay down their lives for pluralism and diversity?

Who will fight and die for the Eurozone and EU?

On Aug. 4, 1914, the anti-militarist German Social Democrats, the oldest and greatest socialist party in Europe, voted the credits needed for the Kaiser to wage war on France and Russia. With the German army on the march, the German socialists were Germans first.

Patriotism trumps ideology.

In “Present at the Creation,” Dean Acheson wrote of the postwar world and institutions born in the years he served FDR and Truman in the Department of State: The U.N., IMF, World Bank, Marshall Plan, and with the split between East and West, NATO.

We are present now at the end of all that.

And our transnational elites have a seemingly insoluble problem.

To rising millions in the West, the open borders and free trade globalism they cherish and champion is not a glorious future, but an existential threat to the sovereignty, independence and identity of the countries they love. And they will not go gentle into that good night.

Share Two Edges of the Sword Post:
No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *